Hands On With the Samsung Galaxy Note 5 and Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+by Joshua Ho on August 13, 2015 11:00 AM EST
- Posted in
- Galaxy Note 5
Today, Samsung is announcing the next generation of their Galaxy-brand phablets, the Galaxy Note 5 and the Galaxy S6 edge+. Samsung’s phablets have been one of their greatest smartphone success stories, finding traction in a market when many thought there wouldn’t be a place for such a large phone. And while you will never see some competitors directly admit to it, products like the Note series have legitimized the phablet form factor and required that the competition catch up as well, making the phablet form factor as much of a home court for Samsung as there can be.
Starting with their 2014 models, Samsung introduced two different phablets, the Galaxy Note 4 and the simply titled Galaxy Note Edge. This year Samsung is retaining the dual phablet approach, however in the case of the Edge product Samsung has shifted gears on what they want to do. For 2015 Samsung seems to be going after a new audience in the form of the Galaxy S6 edge+, which is a more distinct derivative of the Note 5 platform with some greater feature changes than just a curved screen. To try and explain what I mean, I’ve included the specs below.
Galaxy S6 edge+
Galaxy Note 5
|SoC||Samsung LSI Exynos 7420
4xA57 @ 2.1GHz
4xA53 @ 1.5GHz
|Samsung LSI Exynos 7420
4xA57 @ 2.1GHz
4xA53 @ 1.5GHz
|GPU||Mali T760MP8 @ 772MHz||Mali T760MP8 @ 772MHz|
|RAM||4GB LPDDR4||4GB LPDDR4|
|NAND||32/64GB UFS 2.0||32/64/128GB UFS 2.0|
|Display||5.7-inch 2560x1440 SAMOLED
Dual edge display
|5.7-inch 2560x1440 SAMOLED|
|Network||2G / 3G / 4G
UE Category 6/9 LTE
|2G / 3G / 4G
UE Category 6/9 LTE
|Dimensions||154.4 x 75.8 x 6.9 mm
|153.2 x 76.1 x 7.6 mm
|Camera||16MP rear camera,
1.12 µm pixels, 1/2.6" CMOS size,
5MP F/1.9 FFC
|16MP rear camera,
1.12µm pixels, 1/2.6" CMOS size
5MP F/1.9 FFC
|Battery||3000 mAh (11.55 Wh)
|3000 mAh (11.55 Wh)
|OS||Android 5.1 with TouchWiz (At launch)||Android 5.1 with TouchWiz (At launch)|
|Connectivity||2x2 802.11a/b/g/n/ac + BT 4.2, USB2.0, GPS/GNSS, NFC||2x2 802.11a/b/g/n/ac + BT 4.2, USB2.0, GPS/GNSS, NFC|
As one can see, the Galaxy Note 5 and Galaxy S6 edge+ share a lot in common. They have the same SoC, same amount of DRAM, almost identical displays, the same cameras, fingerprint scanners, and the same battery. Ultimately what differs between the two devices is not the underlying hardware, but the functionality and form factor of the devices.
There are really two important differences between the two, namely the removal of the S-Pen and addition of the curved display to the Galaxy S6 edge+. The result is that while the Galaxy Note 5 is a traditional Note phablet, the Galaxy S6 edge+ is closer to a very large Galaxy S6 edge, and this is why these two closely related devices are placed in very different product lines. In some ways, I suspect that this will be a litmus test for the S-Pen functionality in general, as sales may prove Note functionality has a relatively small effect on the desirability of a phablet.
Moving past the distinction between the two models, the Galaxy Note 5 and Galaxy S6 edge+ share very similar industrial and material design. The bezel surrounding the display and the back cover both continue to use the highly reflective patterning that we first saw with the Galaxy S6, and in the case of the Galaxy Note 5 the bezel surrounding the display has become even thinner than before. Like the Galaxy S6 edge, the plus variant has bezels that are effectively equivalent to the Galaxy Note 5 as the angle reduces the effective size of the technically larger bezel.
With the Galaxy S6, there was a noticeable distinction between the normal version and the edge variant when it came to in-hand feel as the standard version was significantly thicker on the left and right sides of the phone. With the Galaxy Note 5, this difference is lessened, but the difference in in-hand comfort definitely remains. The big driver for this is the use of 3D glass on the back cover of the Galaxy Note 5, which allows for a more ergonomic design in the hand. I can’t help but compare this to the first phablet that I’ve seen with a 3D glass back cover, namely the Xiaomi Mi Note line, which feels remarkably similar. At any rate, the Note 5 seems to remain more ergonomic than the edge variant, which has a flat back but a curved display.
One of the major updates changes to the Galaxy Note 5 is improvements on the S-Pen, which has a number of new changes to the design and software functionality. On the hardware side, the pen itself now has a changed mechanism that has a push button top that allows the pen to be completely flush inside the phone when not in use, but easily ejected by pushing on the top of the pen to make it protrude. The digitizer also has dramatically reduced latency. In my experience, this helps a lot with making writing more natural on the Note 5 as I don’t hesitate as much while waiting for the input to catch up.
On the software side, Samsung has added a host of notable additions to extend the functionality of the S-Pen, namely PDF annotation, an Air command floating button, customizable shortcuts, and scroll capture. PDF annotation sounds exactly like what you might expect, which is the ability to write directly on a PDF and save the results. This has obvious utility in cases like signing documents, as the user experience involved in digitally signing a document is horrific and usually goes something like printing out a PDF, signing the PDF, and scanning the signed document. In the case of the Note 5, signing a document is pretty much as easy as opening the PDF with the right application, writing a signature with the S-Pen, and saving the changes.
Meanwhile the Air command floating button and customizable shortcuts are somewhat more mundane. The floating button just allows for one-tap access to what was previously hidden behind the button press of the pen, and customizable shortcuts in the Air command menu is useful but not exactly life-changing.
Scroll capture is also arguably a “minor” feature, but I would argue that its value is significant when it comes to improving the user experience of the phone. In short, this screenshot mode makes it possible to screenshot a long list in an entire screenshot, so something like Google Maps directions can be taken as a single scrollable screenshot rather than 2-20 screenshots that might have overlapping information and potentially missing information from the ListView. However, as far as I can tell this capture mode is strangely hidden behind S-Pen functionality when it really should be integrated into the existing screenshot capture gestures that programmatically determines whether to present this scroll capture mode.
Although the camera configuration is unchanged from the Galaxy S6 with an IMX240 or S5K2P2 camera sensor, f/1.9 optics and a 5MP FFC, there are some new and interesting features present in the camera application. One notable additional is improved pro mode, with extended ISO range down to 50 ISO and the addition of a shutter speed toggle for long exposures. However, manual white balance remains unchanged as far as I can tell with only a few presets rather than fine-grained color temperature adjustments. I was unable to get a RAW sample from the device, but it will be interesting to see if Samsung has properly implemented sensor and lens corrections into the RAW files.
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
tareyza - Thursday, August 13, 2015 - link3000 mAh battery? Some 5.1 inch phones have even more battery than that, and considering the increased size compared to the Galaxy S6, I feel like battery life will not have gotten any better - and this is on their line for heavy users. Keeping it non-removable (as it seems) will not make it any better. I'm glad I purchased a S6, the only reason I had considered waiting for this phone was an improved battery, and 3000mAh honestly doesn't feel like much of an improvement, especially considering the larger screen.
Shadow7037932 - Thursday, August 13, 2015 - linkIt says replaceable battery.
tareyza - Thursday, August 13, 2015 - linkMissed that. In that case, might be more interesting, although their S6-esque design seems like it would be very difficult to remove, not the standard plastic back attached with those hinges. I wonder how the replaceable part will be implemented, given the phone's design.
ddriver - Thursday, August 13, 2015 - linkIt boggles me that samsung is so determined to destroy its true flagship product. I am not talking only about the lack of SD and removable battery, quite honestly, the faux leather back looks better and more "note-y" than this chunk of glass.
lilmoe - Thursday, August 13, 2015 - linkWhere were you when everyone was calling it cheap, tacky and ugly?
ddriver - Thursday, August 13, 2015 - linkBy "everyone" you mean every pathetic crapple fanboy who couldn't think of a substantiated argument and was dying on the inside that crapple had nothing even close to the note?
I'd prefer faux leather to real leather back cover, the faux is more durable, and I am not really a fan of having dead animal body parts in my electronic products. It could also have been some kind of durable fabric, molded with epoxy, that could too achieve vintage and note-y look.
id4andrei - Friday, August 14, 2015 - linkI agree with you but the market has sanctioned the resilient, modular and overall common sense design of the past. The market has validated instead shatter prone, electromagnetically challenged, thin and"flexible" iphones. Also, the tech journalists en masse, even on this very site, have always praised "premium" design over common sense one.
melgross - Friday, August 14, 2015 - linkSamsung's always break very easily because of their flimsy designs. They also bend at the same pressure as the iPhone 6, except that the glass shatters at that pressure, so don't get your panties too tight .
TedKord - Monday, August 17, 2015 - linkI've never had a Samsung break. I've also never seen a single report of one bending in a front pocket.
TrojMacReady - Monday, August 17, 2015 - linkFalse. The S6 was voted most durable by the guys who did the bend test you're referring to and their results for a bend test in the center say that:
- the iPhone 6 and 6 Plus bent at 110 lbs pressure in the center
- the iPhone 6 case also separated at 110 lbs
- the S6 did not bend at 110 lbs pressure
- the S6 Edge did not bend, but got a cracked screen at 110lbs pressure
Computer Bild tested the weak spot for the iPhones instead, pressure at the point near the volume buttons instead of the center:
- iPhone 6 started bending at 44 lbs
- iPhone 6 Plus started bending at 66 lbs.
In other words, a massive difference between the S6 and iPhone 6.