The SKUs


The Opteron 6176 looks a bit ridiculous as it delivers only 4% more performance at 30% higher power and 20% higher prices. The real reason behind this CPU is to battle another tanker, the Nehalem EX that Intel is going to launch tomorrow.  The TDP and clockspeeds of that huge chip are very similar. If your application scales poorly and you don't care about power consumption, the X5677 is your champion; it is probably the fastest chip on the market for applications with low thread counts.  

AMD vs. Intel 2-socket SKU Comparison
Intel Xeon Model
Cores TDP Speed (GHz) Price AMD Opteron Model Cores TDP GHz Price
W5680 6 130W 3.30 GHz $1663 6176 SE 12 105/137W 2.3 GHz $1386
X5670 6 95W 2.93 GHz $1440          
X5660 6 95W 2.80 GHz $1219 6174 12 80/115W 2.2 GHz $1165
X5650 6 95W 2.66 GHz $996 6172 12 80/115W 2.1 GHz $989
X5677 4 130W 3.46 GHz $1663 2439SE 6 105/137W 2.8 GHz ?
X5667 4 95W 3.06 GHz $1440          
          6168 12 80/115W 1.9 GHz $744
E5640 4 80W 2.66 GHz $744 6136 8 80/115W 2.4 GHz $744
E5630 4 80W 2.53 GHz $551 6134 8 80/115W 2.3 GHz $523
E5620 4 80W 2.40 GHz $387 6128 8 80/115W 2.0 GHz $266
L5640 6 60W 2.26 GHz $996 6164 HE 12 65/? W 1.7 GHz $744
          6128 HE 8 65/? W 2.0 GHz $523
          6124 HE 8 65/? W 1.8 GHz $455
L5630 4 40W 2.13 GHz $551          
L5620 4 40W 1.86 GHz $440          


The most interesting parts that AMD offers are the dodeca-core 6174 (2.2GHz), the octal-core 6136 (2.4GHz) and the octal-core low power 6128 (2.0GHz).  The 6174 targets those with well scaling multi-threaded applications such as huge databases and virtualized loads. The 8-core 6136 might even be better as most schedulers find it easier to distribute threads and process over a power of 2 cores. Lots of applications also don't scale beyond 16 cores and the chip comes with a 200MHz clockspeed bonus and a very reasonable price.

The 6128 HE is also an interesting one. The 6128 HE might be a good way to reconcile low response times with low power, but we'll have to find that out later.

Magny-Cours Benchmark Methods and Systems
Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • 564265425722557 - Monday, March 29, 2010 - link

    1. Why is the TDP of the 65W ACP Magny Cours the question mark? And are you sure the TDP of the 80W ACP ones 115W?

    2. The Intel systems have only 24GB ram against the 32GB ram on the 2S magny cours. That's why the 100GB database test favors the Magny cours by a large margin.
  • JohanAnandtech - Monday, March 29, 2010 - link

    AMD told us the TDP values of the Magny-Cours at 80 and 105W ACP. The TDP values of the Lower power versions were not disclosed yet.

    And as we disclosed on the benchmark config page, none of the benches uses more than 20 GB. The vAPus mark I uses about 19 GB. The SQL Server uses much less. While the SQL server test has to scan through the complete index, it does access the complete 100 GB data. There absolutely no advantage for the Opterons there. We checked.

    The fact that we spec the servers like that is a direct consequence of their memory channels (3 and 4). There is not much we can do about that.
  • Penti - Tuesday, March 30, 2010 - link

    How about about 4P performance? It's cheap now and it's AMD whole selling point. I guess you can get a 4P 48-core 128GB system for not that much. How would that compare to a say 2P Nehalem 12-core 92GB? Wouldn't they cost about the same? Will it still be competitive against 8-core 2P Nehalem-EX? And how about the 4P (like 6-core versions) Nehalem-EX? How about the 8-core versions of 6100 series Opterons?
  • elnexus - Wednesday, March 31, 2010 - link

    In answer to cost:

    Compare our 2P Xeon 5600-series Workstation :
    with our 4P Opteron 6100-series Workstation:

    (I hope this isn't condemned as advertising, since it is an attempt to answer a question about price vs performance.)

    Note how low priced the 6128 chip is (the default chip included in the base price).

    AMD, I think are running away from Intel if you factor in the price...
  • Penti - Wednesday, March 31, 2010 - link

    Thanks, I don't condemn it as advertising as this is a new platform so it's interesting and hard to get prices for complete systems yet. Basically 4P 8-core 6100-series opterons with 128GB DDR3 ECC REG cost as much as 2P six-core Xeon (Westmere EP) with 96GB DDR3 ECC REG. Mainly because you can use cheaper 4GB sticks and still get 128GB. And partly because there's no longer any markup for above >2P parts. I guess it accounts for something. Yeah, 6128 chip virtually don't cost nothing for being 4P compatible. Guess it helps AMD for a lot of workload scenarios. And since you can get 4P in 1U it's really nothing that speaks against it. Will be interesting to see what the Nehalem-EX can do though.
  • TitanusComp - Wednesday, April 6, 2011 - link

    You can really get a good idea by comparing this two products:

    48 Cores:

    24 Cores (Quad SLi Capable)

    Now, things to consider, do you need CPU or GPU power?
  • duploxxx - Monday, March 29, 2010 - link

    To make the whole benchmark complete I think you should ask some AMD Opteron 6136 from AMD to get a full review.
  • duploxxx - Monday, March 29, 2010 - link

    and add the 56xx 4core counterpart off course
  • JohanAnandtech - Tuesday, March 30, 2010 - link

    We are working on it. Expect an update with new SKUs this month. I would say next week, but I would like to take some time to do some in depth analysis.
  • Hacp - Monday, March 29, 2010 - link

    I want to ask why are you biased against AMD? You should base your tests based on price. AMD is selling their 12 core for the price of an Intel 6 core. Compare apples to apples! Do a 12 core vs 6 core comparison and see who wins. Otherwise, you are doing a disservice.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now