System Performance

Powered by the latest Intel Core i7-1185G7 processor, the MSI Prestige 14 is our first look at Tiger Lake in a production device. Intel’s Ice Lake platform was a strong step forward, with a new process and a new microarchitecture, and Tiger Lake looks to improve on that with a tweaked CPU core, improved frequencies thanks to the improved 10 nm Superfin process, and perhaps most importantly, Intel’s new Xe graphics in Tiger Lake promise a big step forward in terms of integrated graphics performance.

The Core-i7-1185G7 features four Willow Cove cores, with a peak single-core Turbo frequency of 4.8 GHz. This alone is a big jump over the Core i7-1065G7, which topped out at just 3.9 GHz. The CPU is fed by LPDDR4X-4267 memory as well, which is an improvement over the last generation of devices. The new Tiger Lake platform also adds support for not just Thunderbolt 4, but also PCIe 4.0, meaning faster storage is available.

While Intel has certainly struggled over the last several years, the company does seem to be moving in the right direction again, albeit not as quickly as they would probably prefer. Let’s dig into this new Tiger Lake platform and see how it performs. As a reminder, you can use our Online Bench to compare the MSI Prestige 14 Evo to any other laptop we’ve ever tested.

PCMark

PCMark 10 - Essentials

PCMark 10 - Productivity

PCMark 10 - Digital Content Creation

PCMark 10 - Overall

UL’s PCMark tests all aspects of a system, from CPU and GPU performance, to memory and storage, with several test suites focusing on different use cases, and using real-world applications such as web, video chat, and gaming. The MSI Prestige 14 performs very well here thanks to the improved Willow Cove CPU and the new Xe graphics.

Cinebench

Cinebench R20 - Single-Threaded Benchmark

Cinebench R20 - Multi-Threaded Benchmark

Although version R23 has just been released, for now we’ll continue to showcase R20 scores until we have enough R23 results for comparisons. The higher-frequency Tiger Lake design makes a large jump in single-threaded performance, easily surpassing the other laptop processors. On multi-thread, the quad-core i7 offers eight threads thanks to SMT, and scores very close to an eight-core Ryzen 7 4700U. Tiger Lake makes a big jump here compared to Ice Lake.

Handbrake

Handbrake Transcoding (Software)

Handbrake Transcoding (Hardware)

For video transcoding, Handbrake is likely the most popular solution. It offers both software transcoding done on the CPU, as well as hardware transcoding, which in the case of an Intel processor is Intel’s QuickSync media block. Somewhat surprisingly, the software transcode was not really much faster on the new Tiger Lake than it was on Ice Lake, but the hardware transcode did gain over the older design. It still can’t quite match Renoir though on software or hardware transcoding.

7-Zip

7-Zip Compression

7-Zip Decompression

The open source file compression utility 7-Zip includes a built-in benchmark. The gains Intel has made over Ice Lake show up again here, with a strong win over last year’s i7 laptops. The eight cores on the Ryzen 7 4700U though are well-utilized here, and Tiger Lake can’t quite catch up with just four cores.

Web Performance

For 2020, we have moved to the new Chromium Edge on Windows 10 for all web testing. As much of the performance of the web can be tied to the underlying browser, consistency is key, and we found the Chromium Edge was one of the best performing browsers on Windows.

Speedometer 2.0

WebXPRT 3

The gains Tiger Lake has made over Ice Lake on web performance are significant, and the higher frequency of the i7-1185G7 really makes a big difference here. The gains in Speedometer 2.0 are very impressive.

Storage Performance

Tiger Lake is the first platform from Intel to offer PCIe 4.0 support, which, at least for now, is mostly tied to faster storage. MSI has tapped the Phison PS5016-E16 SSD controller in both 512 GB and 1 TB size offerings, with the review unit being the smaller 512 GB model.

For 2020, we’ve moved to utilizing the PCMark Storage tests, which utilize real-world application traces for programs such as Adobe CC, and common tasks like booting Windows. The benchmark records bandwidth and access time, and calculates an overall score.

PCMark 10 System Drive Benchmark Bandwidth

PCMark 10 System Drive Benchmark Average Access Time

PCMark 10 System Drive Benchmark Score

The new PCIe 4.0 drive is the top performing laptop drive we’ve tested yet. The results are not wildly higher than the PCIe 3.0 drives tested in the past, but that is to be expected for most actual storage tasks, and unless you are doing a lot of large file copies, the extra performance is noticeable, but not as big of a jump as going from SATA SSDs to NVMe would have been.

Introduction & Design Graphics Performance
POST A COMMENT

63 Comments

View All Comments

  • lmcd - Friday, December 18, 2020 - link

    ASUS provides great support for its monitors. No idea if that extends to laptops but it might?

    Otherwise I'm right with you on the terrible support.
    Reply
  • Spunjji - Friday, December 18, 2020 - link

    It's more profitable long-term to provide dismal support. As long as everybody in the PC market is providing a roughly equally poor standard of support, then it ceases to be a factor for comparison, and they can all benefit by paying poorly-trained and demotivated staff a pittance. Reply
  • 0iron - Thursday, December 17, 2020 - link

    I hope there's some explanation on PCMark 10 - Productivity results. Reply
  • vikas.sm - Thursday, December 17, 2020 - link

    The USB 2.0 port is possibly for
    1. Installing various flavors of linux.
    2. Allowing mouse/KB connection while blocking data transfer in an office environment.
    I've worked on hundreds of machines where OS installation just didn't work properly with the media connected to a USB 3.0 port. Granted, this was a few years ago, but I cant see other logical reasons for it.
    Reply
  • Samus - Friday, December 18, 2020 - link

    I can't believe how fast these 15-watt CPU's are. They obliterate many current 65w+ desktop CPU's. Reply
  • Spunjji - Friday, December 18, 2020 - link

    Only if those CPUs are Intel, and only if we continue to pretend that a 50W turbo and ~35W continuous power draw is "15W". 65W Zen 3 nukes this from orbit.

    If you actually limit the CPU to 15W long power draw (or even 20W) it's significantly slower.
    Reply
  • edzieba - Monday, December 21, 2020 - link

    The battery life results belie the "but it's not 15W, it's really 50W!" claims. There's a reason constant-power CPU operation was abandoned by everyone at least a decade ago. Reply
  • logoffon - Friday, December 18, 2020 - link

    They should've put the Fn key on where that stupid duplicated key is so that the right Ctrl key would be in full-size. I don't understand why they thought having two backslash keys were a good idea. Reply
  • sonny73n - Friday, December 18, 2020 - link

    What a stupid design with the back edge of the display is also the foot when the lid lifts up (copied from Asus).
    Warning: 1- Don't open and close the lid too often or the hard plastic feet will wear out and get scratches which will catch dust making your laptop looks nasty. 2- Type lightly. Don't rest your palms on the laptop when you type or the hinges might break.
    Reply
  • sonny73n - Friday, December 18, 2020 - link

    And yay, the power button is where the delete key should be (also copied from stupid Asus Zenbook design). Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now