Today Meizu announced its 2020 flagship follow-up to the popular Meizu 16s: the new Meizu 17 and 17 Pro. The two new phones represent a design shift for the company as it moves to a new industrial design that’s a bit more unique. The new flagship phones are powered by the new Snapdragon 865 SoC and house Sony’s latest IMX686 64MP 1/1.72” main camera sensor.

Meizu is releasing two devices this year, both have the same form-factor with a 6.6” 90Hz OLED screen, but they differ in their other cameras and some other internal specifications, making for a slight price segmentation between the two units.

Meizu 17 Series
  Meizu 17 Meizu 17 Pro
SoC Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 
1x Cortex-A77 @ 2.84GHz
3x Cortex-A77 @ 2.42GHz
4x Cortex-A55 @ 1.80GHz

Adreno 640 @ 587MHz
Display 6.6" AMOLED
2340 x 1080 (19.5:1)

90Hz Refresh Rate
180Hz Touch Sampling
Dimensions 160.0 x 77.2 x 8.5 mm
199 grams 217 grams
128/256 GB UFS 3.1
Battery 4500mAh (17.35Wh) typ.
30W Fast Charging
No wireless charging 27W Fast Wireless Charging
Front Camera 20MP
Primary Rear Camera 64MP 0.8µm 1/72" IMX686
(16MP 1.6µm 2x2 binning)


26mm eq.
Rear Camera
12MP 1.4µm IMX362
secondary main?

??mm eq.
8MP 1.0µm OV 08A10

79mm eq.
Rear Camera
8MP 1.12µm S5K4H7

118° / 16mm eq.
32MP IMX616

129° / 15mm eq.
5MP 1.12µm S5K5E9
Macro Camera

3D ToF
4G / 5G
Snapdragon 5G - Snapdragon Modem X55  (Discrete)

(LTE Category 24/22)
DL = 2500 Mbps - 7x20MHz CA, 1024-QAM
UL = 316 Mbps 3x20MHz CA, 256-QAM

(5G NR Sub-6)
DL = 7000 Mbps
UL = 3000 Mbps
SIM Size NanoSIM
Wireless 802.11a/b/g/n/ac/ax
BT 5.1 LE, NFC, GPS/Glonass/Galileo/BDS
Connectivity USB Type-C
no 3.5mm jack
Special Features On-screen fingerprint sensor,
Stereo Speakers
Launch OS Android 10 w/ FlymeOS
Launch Prices 8+128GB: RMB3699 (~$522)
8+256GB: RMB3999 (~$564)
8+128GB: RMB4299 (~$606)
12+256GB: RMB4699 (~$663)

Both phones are powered by the new Snapdragon 865 chipset by Qualcomm offering top of the line flagship performance. The two devices are 5G enabled and come with support with relevant sub-6GHz band support in their respective launch markets, starting with today’s China launch.

Meizu uses 128 or 256GB of UFS 3.1 storage capacities for both phones, while on the DRAM side the Meizu 17 comes with 8GB of LPDDR4X, and the 17 Pro offers either 8GB or 12GB of LPDDR5, marking Meizu as one of the rarer vendors who make use of the chipset’s hybrid memory controller.

The phone is actually quite large and a significant upsizing from past Meizu flagships, as the 17’s now come in a 160mm x 77.2mm (!!) footprint, making these one of the biggest phones out there. Thickness comes in at 8.5mm for both units.

In the bigger form-factor we find a 6.6” AMOLED display from Samsung which is said to have been designed in collaboration with Meizu to achieve smaller 3mm top and bottom bezels. The resolution is at 2340 x 1080p, so a 19.5:9 aspect ratio, and the screen support 90Hz refresh rate alongside 180Hz touch sampling.

The front camera module is a 20MP unit with f/2.0 optics and is a display hole cut-out design. The speciality here is that the cut-out radius is only 2.99mm which if we’re not mistaken is the smallest radius of its kind to date in a smartphone.

Whilst both variants feature the same 4500mAh battery capacity, the 17 Pro is heavier at 217 vs 199g because of the inclusion of different internal hardware. The one thing that is outright omitted from the regular version is wireless charging, whilst the Pro version supports 27W fast wireless charging, on top of the 30W wired charging for both units.

Both phones share the same main camera sensor with is a 64MP IMX686 – the successor to the widely popular IMX586 last year. The sensor features 0.8µm pixel pitches and is of a 1/1.72” diagonal which means it’s among the bigger sensors out there today. With 2x2 pixel binning it results in 16MP photos with an effective light gathering pixel-pitch of 1.6µm. The optics are a 26mm equivalent focal length with an f/1.8 aperture. Meizu seemingly doesn’t outright specify OIS so we do hope it’s present on the module.

The other camera modules differ completely between the two variants, starting off with the regular Meizu 17:

We find a 12MP secondary IMX362 module that in some PR materials is described as a telephoto module, although the company doesn’t exactly list the zoom or focal length. We find f/1.9 optics here.

There’s also a smaller Samsung S5K4H7 8MP ultra-wide angle module with a 118° field-of-view / 16mm equivalent focal length with f/2.2 optics, as well as a 5MP macro camera module.

The Meizu 17 Pro changes up the non-main camera modules. First of all, the telephoto module is now powered by an Omnivision 08A10 sensor with a 3x zoom capability to up to 79mm equivalent focal length, but it’s of a lower 8MP resolution with 1.0µm pixels.

Ultra-Wide Macro Shot

The ultra-wide angle on the 17 Pro is extremely interesting as it’s a 32MP IMX616, a very rare configuration. For some reason Meizu describes this as a 129° field of view module even though the focal length is only 15mm equivalent, narrower than some other devices we’ve seen out there, so the specs here are a bit conflicting. There’s f/2.2 optics on the unit. The speciality here is that Meizu dropped the macro module in favour of a 3D ToF (Time of flight) sensor, as the ultra-wide-angle unit has an auto-focus mechanism that allows it to focus as closely as 3cm and act both as a ultra-wide as well as a macro unit.

The Meizu 17 is available as 8+128 or 8+256GB configurations for RMB3699 (~$522) and RMB3999 (~$564), while the Meizu 17 Pro comes in either 8+128 or 12+256GB configs at RMB4299 (~$606) or RMB4699 (~$663), with pre-orders in China starting today and availability starting Monday the 11th. We expect Meizu to release the phones in other markets such as Europe later in a few months’ time, as they usually do.

Related Reading:

Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • 1_rick - Friday, May 8, 2020 - link

    Typo: in the spec chart, the screen ratio is not 19.5:1.
  • shabby - Friday, May 8, 2020 - link

    Also the camera has a typo 1/1.72" imx 686
  • flyingpants265 - Friday, May 8, 2020 - link

    And, as usual:
    No front speakers = No buy. I will never pay money to cup my hands around a brand new expensive phone ever again.
    No 3.5mm jack = No buy. Not falling for the scam, sorry.

    Waterproofing and OIS aren't dealbreakers for me. Looks like they haven't been ruled out. But Meizu is a Chinese brand, so their warranty support (replacement motherboard? They can burn out) is unknown. So paying $600 for one is probably out of the question.

    Let's keep in mind the Realme X is $150 USD with SD710/48mp, that is the new baseline for price/performance. I can't use it because it doesn't support my network bands; I suspect they purposefully omitted them so as not to compete with OnePlus's ridiculous $999 phones.
  • Alistair - Saturday, May 9, 2020 - link

    I really want a headphone jack also, but mainly because we can't get good USB headphones. Heck, if Apple starts making USB airpods problem is solved, the lightning ones are great as usual. Same thing with front spacing speakers. The iPhone has great speakers, uses the earpiece and the bottom to put out better sound than my old front facing speakers.
  • Alistair - Saturday, May 9, 2020 - link

    I mean if Apple releases USB earpods, not airpods, I'll probably use those with my Android phones.
  • sonny73n - Sunday, May 10, 2020 - link

    Stop BSing. Your comment gives me the chills. You’re lying thru your teeth with every word that comes out of your pipe hole. iDevices’ speakers suck, especially those waterproofed which are impossible to have clean sounds. You sound like a little kid in his own little world with only iPhones. Your hearing is probably damaged now after using Apple earphones earpods for more than a decade.
    It I’ll ever be forced to use an iPhone, the first thing I’d do is put those garbage earpieces in the trash, unless I can sell them.
    Who knows you could be a deceptive Apple shill.
  • s.yu - Sunday, May 10, 2020 - link

    Understand that most people actually have really low standards.
  • Peskarik - Saturday, May 9, 2020 - link

    Lots of hardware. But these days software is more important than the physical part.
  • eastcoast_pete - Saturday, May 9, 2020 - link

    Not convinced. No 3.5 mm jack (why, in a big, heavy phone?) is one omission, but the thing that gets my second thumb down is the battery capacity. If your phone is in the heavyweight category, make its battery a minimum of 5,000 mAh. For battery, bigger is better, and 5G with an external modem and mm capability plus a higher refresh rate screen both eat power.
  • s.yu - Sunday, May 10, 2020 - link

    The bigger why is why they remove the jack even though their market share is miniscule. Sony certainly learn their lesson.
    Agree with the battery too.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now