UL Benchmarks - PCMark and 3DMark

This section deals with a selection of the UL Futuremark benchmarks - PCMark 10, PCMark 8, and 3DMark. While the first two evaluate the system as a whole, 3DMark focuses on the graphics capabilities.

PCMark 10

UL's PCMark 10 evaluates computing systems for various usage scenarios (generic / essential tasks such as web browsing and starting up applications, productivity tasks such as editing spreadsheets and documents, gaming, and digital content creation). We benchmarked select PCs with the PCMark 10 Extended profile and recorded the scores for various scenarios. These scores are heavily influenced by the CPU and GPU in the system, though the RAM and storage device also play a part. The power plan was set to Balanced for all the PCs while processing the PCMark 10 benchmark.

Futuremark PCMark 10 - Essentials

Futuremark PCMark 10 - Productivity

Futuremark PCMark 10 - Gaming

Futuremark PCMark 10 - Digital Content Creation

Futuremark PCMark 10 - Extended

The performance of the DH370 is not as good as what one might expect from a system equipped with a Core i7-8700. In fact, we see it barely surpassing the DeskMini 310 equipped with a Core i3-8100. Two contributors to this overall issue are the use of a PCIe 3.0 x2 NVMe SSD (compared to the PCIe 3.0 x4 NVMe SSDs in almost all the systems above it in the benchmarks) and the usage of a DDR4-2400 kit (almost all other systems have the SODIMMs operating between 2666 MHz and 3000 MHz).

PCMark 8

We continue to present PCMark 8 benchmark results (as those have more comparison points) while our PCMark 10 scores database for systems grows in size. PCMark 8 provides various usage scenarios (home, creative and work) and offers ways to benchmark both baseline (CPU-only) as well as OpenCL accelerated (CPU + GPU) performance. We benchmarked select PCs for the OpenCL accelerated performance in all three usage scenarios. These scores are heavily influenced by the CPU and the memory sub-system.

Futuremark PCMark 8 - Home OpenCL

Futuremark PCMark 8 - Creative OpenCL

Futuremark PCMark 8 - Work OpenCL

The PCMark 8 numbers follow the PCMark 10 ordering, largely due to the same reasons discussed earlier.

3DMark

UL's 3DMark comes with a diverse set of graphics workloads that target different Direct3D feature levels. Correspondingly, the rendering resolutions are also different. We use 3DMark 2.4.4264 to get an idea of the graphics capabilities of the system. In this section, we take a look at the performance of the Shuttle XPC slim DH370 across the different 3DMark workloads.

3DMark Ice Storm

This workload has three levels of varying complexity - the vanilla Ice Storm, Ice Storm Unlimited, and Ice Storm Extreme. It is a cross-platform benchmark (which means that the scores can be compared across different tablets and smartphones as well). All three use DirectX 11 (feature level 9) / OpenGL ES 2.0. While the Extreme renders at 1920 x 1080, the other two render at 1280 x 720. The graphs below present the various Ice Storm worloads' numbers for different systems that we have evaluated.

UL 3DMark - Ice Storm Workloads

3DMark Cloud Gate

The Cloud Gate workload is meant for notebooks and typical home PCs, and uses DirectX 11 (feature level 10) to render frames at 1280 x 720. The graph below presents the overall score for the workload across all the systems that are being compared.

UL 3DMark Cloud Gate Score

3DMark Sky Diver

The Sky Diver workload is meant for gaming notebooks and mid-range PCs, and uses DirectX 11 (feature level 11) to render frames at 1920 x 1080. The graph below presents the overall score for the workload across all the systems that are being compared.

UL 3DMark Sky Diver Score

3DMark Fire Strike Extreme

The Fire Strike benchmark has three workloads. The base version is meant for high-performance gaming PCs. Similar to Sky Diver, it uses DirectX 11 (feature level 11) to render frames at 1920 x 1080. The Ultra version targets 4K gaming system, and renders at 3840 x 2160. However, we only deal with the Extreme version in our benchmarking - It renders at 2560 x 1440, and targets multi-GPU systems and overclocked PCs. The graph below presents the overall score for the Fire Strike Extreme benchmark across all the systems that are being compared.

UL 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score

3DMark Time Spy

The Time Spy workload has two levels with different complexities. Both use DirectX 12 (feature level 11). However, the plain version targets high-performance gaming PCs with a 2560 x 1440 render resolution, while the Extreme version renders at 3840 x 2160 resolution. The graphs below present both numbers for all the systems that are being compared in this review.

UL 3DMark - Time Spy Workloads

3DMark Night Raid

The Night Raid workload is a DirectX 12 benchmark test. It is less demanding than Time Spy, and is optimized for integrated graphics. The graph below presents the overall score in this workload for different system configurations.

UL 3DMark Fire Strike Extreme Score

The numbers in the 3DMark workloads roughly tally with what can be expected from the Intel UHD Graphics 630 (also present in the Core i3-8100, which was used in the DeskMini 310 review). It is clear that performance in 3D / gaming workloads is not a strong point of the XPC slim DH370. Fortunately, Shuttle makes no mention of the gaming segment when discussing the target markets for the system.

BAPCo SYSmark 2018 Miscellaneous Performance Metrics - I
Comments Locked

37 Comments

View All Comments

  • Guspaz - Wednesday, May 8, 2019 - link

    It has to do with the subject of my post. Shuttle sells this as a barebones claiming support for products meeting certain standards. And I’m warning that in the past they have made that claim in a way that is misleading at best and false at worst.
  • Skeptical123 - Wednesday, May 8, 2019 - link

    I personal agree with the content of the article in that it's a good box for the use case and price. Except for this one snippet that too many tech reviews have, its good but could be better if it had these expensive rarely used but cool to have features. The reality is this is a custom product for a limited market and regardless of that there is still a lot of competitions in the small form factor pc space around the mid $300 mark. Meaning the company needed to meet a certain price target which I think we can all agree they did at $330. The additional chip required for thunderbolt 3 from intel along costs up to $10s alone. Regardless any additional thunderbolt enclosure would add to the size of the unit which kinda defeats the whole point. And the reality is the people buying these systems know what they're looking for and if they find this product they can defiantly find a similar product that has what they want, say a 10gig Nic integrated in a similar size for a little more $. The company could have chosen to make that product, they did not. That is not a bad thing nor a bad decision.
  • Skeptical123 - Wednesday, May 8, 2019 - link

    the quote from the article "Shuttle does have scope for improving the DH370 further - for starters, we would have liked a couple of the USB 3.1 Gen 2 Type-A ports to be Type-C. A Thunderbolt 3 port would have also been nice to have, given that spare PCIe lanes from the PCH as well as the CPU are available."
  • jiangann - Friday, May 10, 2019 - link

    wow, very good and detail article. I learned a lot about <a href="https://www.jotrin.com">electronic components</a>.Article layout is very generous and beautiful
  • jiangann - Friday, May 10, 2019 - link

    if we want to know more about it, we can have a look at this website https://www.jotrin.com/product/
  • TomWomack - Thursday, May 16, 2019 - link

    "It is likely that driving three 4Kp60 displays can take up a significant chunk of the available bandwidth, resulting in the performance loss that we see above"

    Not that significant - 3840*2160 pixels * 4 bytes per pixel * 3 displays * 60fps is 6GByte/sec and the machine supposedly has 40GByte/sec available.
  • censtry - Thursday, October 15, 2020 - link

    if we want to know more about Censtry electronics , we can have a look at this website https://www.censtry.com/

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now