The Huawei MateBook X Pro Review: Calling Out The Competition
by Brett Howse on June 27, 2018 8:00 AM ESTGraphics Performance
Here’s where the Huawei MateBook X Pro stands out from the crowd. Most Ultrabooks rely on Intel’s UHD620 graphics, Huawei added in the NVIDIA GeForce MX150 GPU to the mix. With 384 CUDA cores, and 2 GB of GDDR5, the MX150 adds a bit more punch and it’s the first time we’ve had a chance to test it in a notebook.
One of the biggest advantages of having a discrete GPU is that you’re no longer forced inside of the thermal envelope of just the CPU. NVIDIA doesn’t release the TDP figures of its mobile chips, but you can expect the MX150 to likely have at least 15-Watts to itself. This also helps the CPU by not having to clock down as aggressively as when the GPU is integrated. Of course, this also requires adequate cooling to keep both chips in check.
To complicate matters, NVIDIA offers two different MX150 parts set up for different TDPs. Since this is in a thin and light ultrabook, it's perhaps not surprising to see that it features the lower speed version which has a maximum boost frequency of 1038 MHz. The higher TDP version for thicker laptops can boost to around 1500 MHz.
We’re in the process of transitioning to a new suite of games for 2018 and beyond, but because this laptop isn’t a gaming laptop, the games in our existing suite are more than demanding enough. But first, the synthetics.
3DMark
FutureMark’s 3DMark offers several tests with a variety of GPU demands. Fire Strike is the most demanding, then Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, and finally Ice Storm Unlimited which is designed for smartphones and tablet-class GPUs.
The NVIDIA MX150 offers a significant performance gain from the integrated GPU alone, and the more demanding the test, the larger the benefit. Fire Strike is an impressive 143% faster on the Huawei MateBook X Pro than the ASUS ZenBook 3 with the same CPU but just the UHD 620 graphics. On top of that, the MX150 also squeaks past the AMD Ryzen 7 2700U powered Acer Swift 3 with its Vega graphics.
GFXBench
Kishonti’s GFXBench is a cross-platform test that uses OpenGL on the desktop, and since most new PC games don’t use OpenGL, it’s really just a chance to see how the OpenGL drivers are for a GPU. Once again the MX150 does very well here compared to integrated alone.
Dota 2
Valve’s Dota 2 is one of the most popular arena games around, and the engine is dynamic enough that it can be run fairly well on even low-end machines, making it a great game to test on an Ultrabook. The MateBook X Pro does very well on this test, easily outclassing the integrated GPUs on both the Intel and AMD laptops. The gap over the AMD Vega mobile likely has a lot to do with Dota 2 being a fairly CPU limited game, and having a separate TDP for the CPU and GPU like the MateBook does is a nice benefit.
Tomb Raider
Although several years old now, the original reboot of the Tomb Raider franchise can still be punishing to laptop GPUs. At low to medium settings though, the MX150 does very well on this game, and is more than just playable. It once again edges the Ryzen 7 2700U in the value settings where the CPU is a bigger factor, but that gap closes once the GPU is taxed a bit more in the medium settings. At our Enthusiast levels, no Ultrabook is playable.
Rise of the Tomb Raider
The sequel to Tomb Raider is even more demanding, and at our value settings is just averaging 30 FPS, meaning you’d really have to turn this game down to even have a chance to play it on an Ultrabook.
Civilization VI
This game can normally be played with framerates that aren’t anywhere near a First Person game, thanks to the turn-based design of Civilization VI, but there were difficulties getting the game to run at our 16:9 resolutions we normally use, and the game was almost unplayable at even 1366x768. This is one of the issues you run into with an aspect ratio on the display which isn’t standard.
Bioshock Infinite
Like Tomb Raider, this game is several years old now but can still bring laptops to their knees, and we see that again with the MateBook X Pro. At low resolutions, it does very well, but on our enthusiast levels you’d not be able to play the game.
GRID Autosport
This game is heavily CPU bound, and you can see the gap between the MateBook and the AMD Ryzen 7 2700U powered Swift 3 is quite large. Once again, having separate TDPs helps, as does the extra performance from the Kaby Lake Refresh CPU.
GPU Conclusion
It was great to finally get a chance to test a laptop with the NVIDIA MX150 GPU inside, since Pascal has been such a big update on the bigger GPUs, it only makes sense that it’s also a big update over the GT 940 and other low-end GPUs NVIDIA offered previously. Offering this GPU in the MateBook X Pro provides it significantly more GPU power than Ultrabooks which rely on just the integrated Intel graphics, and it even outperforms the Vega GPU in the Acer Swift 3. There’s no free lunch here though, and Huawei would have had to pay extra for the GPU, and the bill of materials would also have to include the extra space and cooling required.
The MateBook X Pro isn’t a gaming laptop by any means, but with this small increase in GPU performance, it does at least give you the option.
77 Comments
View All Comments
SFNR1 - Thursday, June 28, 2018 - link
if the spyware would be on the SSD, than yes ;-) .notashill - Thursday, June 28, 2018 - link
Are we not remembering the Windows Platform Binary Table 'feature' Lenovo used to automatically reinstall their spyware when the system was wiped with a fresh Windows 10 ISO from Microsoft?Oxford Guy - Tuesday, July 3, 2018 - link
And, installing Windows 10 is installing spyware.Oxford Guy - Tuesday, July 3, 2018 - link
CPUs and other chips have built-in spyware now.Notmyusualid - Thursday, June 28, 2018 - link
Nice, on-topic comment for a change.eek2121 - Saturday, July 7, 2018 - link
The problem is, we in the US are, oddly enough, in a position of 'guilty until proven innocent'. Back doors have been found in enough consumer hardware, accidental or otherwise, to raise serious concerns of security.rocky12345 - Wednesday, June 27, 2018 - link
Coming from a company that is not as well known is this sector the prices are fairly steep. A i5 using Intel's graphics and only 8GB's DDR3L for $1199US is pretty sad I do not care how thin it is not worth more than $799US-$899US and even then that would be if it was from a better known company in this hardware sector.SFNR1 - Wednesday, June 27, 2018 - link
the base model is really quite expensive but the i7-verison i think, keeps it up with the xps and others out thererocky12345 - Wednesday, June 27, 2018 - link
Yea the i7 model with the Graphics card an 16GB memory and larger 512Gb NVMe drive is priced a lot closer to what it should be and I guess if the build quality is good and will last as long as the big brand names systems do then it should be fine.rocky12345 - Wednesday, June 27, 2018 - link
I read the review again because the first time was just before I had to leave for work so I skimmed it. The i7 model is a pretty good deal for sure you get a lot of grunt for that $1500 and from what they said in the review the screen is pretty good and the build quality is good as well. If you want to tinker in some light duty gaming you can with the i7 model and Nvidia graphics. The battery time if also very impressive at least to me it was being that this is a laptop and not a tablet.