Presenting at the UBS Global Technology Conference today, Navin Shenoy, Intel Executive Vice President and General Manager of their Data Center Group, shared an update on Intel's roadmap for 3D XPoint DIMMs. Intel claims that they are on track to launch 3D XPoint memory modules in the second half of 2018. They are projecting that 3D XPoint DIMMs will be an $8B market by 2021.

After launching several Optane SSD products this year based on 3D XPoint memory, Intel had said almost nothing about their progress toward 3D XPoint DIMM memory modules. Intel first publicly showed a prototype 3D XPoint NVDIMM in January 2016, only a few months after unveiling 3D XPoint memory itself. When the first Optane products launched earlier this year, we were told Intel would have more to say on the subject of 3D XPoint DIMMs in 2018, but today's announcement makes it clear they will be selling the actual hardware within about a year.

The launch of 3D XPoint DIMMs will depend on several pieces coming together. First, Intel's 3D XPoint memory must be sufficiently mature to meet the performance and endurance requirements of DIMM-based usage. Their Optane SSDs have all used a PCIe and NVMe interface that adds substantial latency overhead and makes it difficult to assess how close the underlying 3D XPoint memory can come to DRAM performance levels. The Optane SSDs are also shipping with relatively conservative write endurance ratings relative to the eventual expectations for 3D XPoint products: The Optane SSD DC P4800X's 30 drive writes per day for 5 years is not significantly higher than high-endurance flash-based enterprise SSDs can provide.

Second, Intel will need to continue increasing production of 3D XPoint memory as their family of Optane SSDs expands and is joined by 3D XPoint DIMMs. Yesterday, Intel and Micron celebrated the completion of an expansion to building 60 of their IM Flash production facilities in Lehi, Utah. This will significantly increase their production capacity of 3D XPoint memory. So far, Intel seems to have been using almost all of the production of 3D XPoint memory for their Optane products while Micron has yet to publicly introduce any mass-produced 3D XPoint-based products. Micron will most likely start announcing and shipping 3D XPoint products under their QuantX brand within the next year, so Intel won't be getting the full benefit of this capacity boost.

Third, 3D XPoint DIMMs will require server platform support because they are unlikely to operate as standard DDR4 DIMMs. The JEDEC NVDIMM-P standard for persistent memory DIMMs has not been finalized and is expected next year. It's not certain whether the 3D XPoint DIMMs will adhere to the NVDIMM-P standard or if they will use a proprietary interface, but either way they are likely to require updated CPU and motherboard support. Intel's recently-launched Xeon Scalable platform can support DRAM+flash NVDIMM-N modules. The launch next year of 3D XPoint DIMMs may foretell a simultaneous refresh of the Xeon Scalable platform.

Source: Intel

POST A COMMENT

58 Comments

View All Comments

  • III-V - Wednesday, November 15, 2017 - link

    It won't struggle to find a use in the enterprise sector. It's an obvious replacement for DRAM in servers that depend more on memory capacity than performance. That's super useful in HPC. Since you're a moron and need your hand held: the more memory you have, the bigger the simulations you can run.

    If you had read about the products you criticize, like any intelligent person would, you'd embarrass yourself a lot less often. You should try doing that sometime.
    Reply
  • ddriver - Wednesday, November 15, 2017 - link

    Comedy gold right here - you say "servers that depend more on memory capacity than performance" and immediately after than you say "That's super useful in HPC".

    Do you realize that HPC stands for HIGH PERFORMANCE COMPUTING? Yeah, it just makes perfect sense, using a working memory solution that is completely crippled when it comes to high performance in a high performance computing scenario.

    You struggle even with common sense. Calling yourself intelligent all the while embarrassing yourself by posting complete and utter nonsense... You are a stereotypical AT commenters - a clueless wannabe that seeks to cultivate illusion of intelligence by cheering at stuff you know nothing about.
    Reply
  • ddrіver - Thursday, November 16, 2017 - link

    I feel like I'm surrounded by idiots. If the forums here were curated I'd probably be left alone.
    Nobody will ever buy this, I stake my name to this. It's completely useless.
    Reply
  • Capt Calamity - Wednesday, November 29, 2017 - link

    You are an idiot, and obviously a troll. No food for you. Reply
  • FwFred - Wednesday, November 15, 2017 - link

    I have no idea how these will turn out, but you lack imagination or are being purposefully blind f you cant see the value in something like this. Of course general purpose SW won't handle this well. Nobody will buy these and not use them with customized SW packages. Large in-memory databases wouldn't adapt to this technology? Reply
  • tuxRoller - Wednesday, November 15, 2017 - link

    The very fastest devices run close to the limits of the platform. DRAM-based nvme devices perform very similarly to optane.

    https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/6/454

    That last device is optane. Yes, it's faster than the dram nvme device. That's my point. All these devices, including that Samsung nvme, are running at the limits of nvme. Now, yes, those are best case numbers but my point is that we can't yet say what the medium access times are because they are hidden within the noise and granularity of nvme.
    Reply
  • bathotropic - Tuesday, November 14, 2017 - link

    I look forward to having real-time targeted ads that update with every key stroke. Thanks Intel for your big data enhancements. Reply
  • londedoganet - Wednesday, November 15, 2017 - link

    What are you on? Reply
  • Amandtec - Wednesday, November 15, 2017 - link

    Why would you look forward to ads? If you are being sarcastic consider putting a /s at the end of your post to enable the sarcasm font. Reply
  • Spoelie - Wednesday, November 15, 2017 - link

    it's sad that this post needs a special tag to be recognized as sarcasm - especially while it should be blatantly obvious Reply

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now