Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD5H Overclocking

Note: Ivy Bridge does not overclock like Sandy Bridge.  For a detailed report on the effect of voltage on Ivy Bridge (and thus temperatures and power draw), please read Undervolting and Overclocking on Ivy Bridge.

Experience with Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD5H

Overclocking on the UD5H was a mixed back of results.  The automatic overclocks worked, but only if the system liked the memory you were using - the automatic overclocks apply some changes to memory that caused our system to fail using our default G.Skill DDR3-2400 9-11-11 kit.  However, when we used a Patriot DDR3-2133 kit, all was well.

Manual overclocking was clear-cut, as the system applies the overclock at the start of POST rather than the end.  This meant that during the OS loading, if the system was very unstable, a BSOD would show and we entered the BIOS to change the voltages. 

Overall results were a little disappointing, given the other good performances we had with the motherboard.

Methodology:

Our standard overclocking methodology is as follows.  We select the automatic overclock options and test for stability with PovRay and OCCT to simulate high-end workloads.  These stability tests aim to catch any immediate causes for memory or CPU errors.

For manual overclocks, based on the information gathered from previous testing, starts off at a nominal voltage and CPU multiplier, and the multiplier is increased until the stability tests are failed.  The CPU voltage is increased gradually until the stability tests are passed, and the process repeated until the motherboard reduces the multiplier automatically (due to safety protocol) or the CPU temperature reaches a stupidly high level (100ºC+).

Our test bed is not in a case, which should push overclocks higher with fresher (cooler) air.  We also are using Intel's All-in-one Liquid Cooler with its stock fan.  This is a 120mm radiator liquid cooler, designed to mimic a medium-to-high end air cooler.

Automatic Overclock:

For our automatic overclocking, we had to utilize a Patriot DDR3-2133 2x2GB memory kit as the system failed to boot with our G.Skill DDR3-2400 4x4 GB kit when the automatic overclock settings were selected.

EasyTune6 offers three levels of automatic overclocking, along with an Auto Tuning option that stresses the system while raising speeds and voltages.  Here are our results.

At ET Level 1, the system applied a 102.3 MHz BCLK and 41x multiplier, giving a final CPU speed of 4198 MHz.  This gave a +0.150 volt offset to the CPU core, and set the memory to XMP but reduced the speed back one strap due to the enhanced BCLK.  Maximum temperatures for this setting were 78ºC during PovRay and 80ºC during OCCT.

At ET Level 2, the system applied a 103.4 MHz BCLK and 43x multiplier, giving a final CPU speed of 4446.2 MHz.  In the OS, a load voltage of 1.248 volts was reported, and stress testing gave maximum temperatures of 84ºC during PovRay and 88ºC during OCCT.  Memory was also adjusted to one strap below XMP.

At ET Level 4, the system applied a 104.3 MHz BCLK and 45x multiplier, giving a final CPU speed of 4693.9 MHz.  In the OS, a load voltage of 1.284 volts was reported, and stress testing gave maximum temperatures of 96ºC during PovRay and 98ºC during OCCT.  Memory was also adjusted to one strap below XMP.

The Auto Tuning option gave the following experience:

- The system rebooted, and loads a stress-testing program.
- This program gradually raised the multiplier and BCLK.
- The stress testing part of the program crashed at 47x103.5, but tests continued.
- System hard reset at 49x103.5.
- System booted into OS at 48x104 and loaded program again, which crashed and shut down.
- System rebooted at 46x103.3 for full load and 48x103.3 for single core loads. 

This overclock showed 1.296 volts at full load, giving 93ºC during PovRay and 95ºC during OCCT.  However, performing the single core benchmark on PovRay caused a memory error.

Manual Overclock:

Manual overclocking was performed in the BIOS, where the CPU voltage was fixed at 1.100 volts and the multiplier started at 44x.  Here are the results:

At 44x, the system was stable with a BIOS voltage set at 1.100 volts, which led to a load voltage of 1.068 volts in the OS.  Peak temperatures during stability testing were 68ºC during PovRay and 71ºC during OCCT.

At 45x, the system was stable with a BIOS voltage set at 1.125 volts, which led to a load voltage of 1.096 volts in the OS.  Peak temperatures during stability testing were 71ºC during PovRay and 72ºC during OCCT.

At 46x, the system was stable with a BIOS voltage set at 1.175 volts and Load Line Calibration set to Extreme, which led to a load voltage of 1.176 volts in the OS.  Peak temperatures during stability testing were 80ºC during PovRay and 81ºC during OCCT.

At 47x, the system was stable with a BIOS voltage set at 1.225 volts and Load Line Calibration set to Extreme, which led to a load voltage of 1.224 volts in the OS.  Peak temperatures during stability testing were 88ºC during PovRay and OCCT.

At 48x, the system was stable with a BIOS voltage set at 1.275 volts and Load Line Calibration set to Extreme, which led to a load voltage of 1.284 volts in the OS.  Peak temperatures during stability testing were 97ºC during PovRay and 96ºC during OCCT.

Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD5H In The Box, Voltage Readings Test Setup, Power Consumption
Comments Locked

70 Comments

View All Comments

  • Ilias78 - Wednesday, July 25, 2012 - link

    Great review for a great product :) Thank you!
  • thewhat - Thursday, July 26, 2012 - link

    Mediocre POST time alone is making this MB less than great.

    Some manufacturers have shown that fast POST can be achieved. Why can't the rest do the same?
  • IanCutress - Thursday, July 26, 2012 - link

    Typically manufacturers have save guards in place for detecting memory, CPU, digital power delivery, or fan controllers that require initialization. Certain USB 3.0 or SATA controllers also can add a few seconds each to the POST time. This board has three USB 3.0 controllers, dual NIC, mSATA and the rest, so it is unsurprising.

    Ian
  • houkama - Friday, May 24, 2013 - link

    I disagreed as 12 seconds once per time I turned the computer on is hardly something that significantly reduces my enjoyment, so I bothered to buy the board and then I was pleasantly surprised when my post time was closer to 4 seconds. I'm certain that Ian is telling the truth, but in my setup it's just not a problem.
  • greno - Thursday, August 2, 2012 - link

    The Marvell controllers do not support TRIM function for SSD drives.

    If you really test the drive and look for zeroed sectors you'll see that TRIM does not work on Marvell controllers.

    .
  • MamiyaOtaru - Wednesday, July 25, 2012 - link

    no ps/2 port, no buy. Rest of it looks pretty neat though :(
  • Spivonious - Wednesday, July 25, 2012 - link

    Wow, really? I haven't used a PS/2 device in over five years.
  • johnsmith9875 - Wednesday, July 25, 2012 - link

    I'm a big fan of PS/2 keyboards, because USB keyboards are horrible at buffering keystrokes properly.
    A fast typist will notice the difference.
  • SodaAnt - Wednesday, July 25, 2012 - link

    Not really, unless you have a really bad keyboard. I have usb keyboards which you can pretty much hammer the keyboard as fast as you can spam keys and you will never notice the difference.
  • Einy0 - Wednesday, July 25, 2012 - link

    Agreed... You must have used a crappy keyboard or something else was messed up with the pc / os. My brother in law averages 150wpm and doesn't have any issues with USB keyboards. The only limitation I know of USB versus PS/2 is that USB keyboards can limit the number of simultaneous key presses. I've heard of some cheaper ones being limited but most will do at least 7 simultaneous keys. Better ones will do 10 plus.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now