Brian's Intel Dream PC
Hardware Component Price
Processor 2x Intel Xeon X5660 Westmere 32nm
(Hex-core + HTT, 2.8 to 3.2 GHz, 12MB L3, 95W)
2x $1225
CPU HSF 2x Xigmatek Dark Knight-S1283V 2x $45
Motherboard  EVGA Classified SR-2
(Intel 5520, ICH10R, 270-WS-W555-A2)
$590
GPU 2x EVGA SuperClocked GTX 580 2x $530
Hard Drives 4x Western Digital 1.5TB (WD1501FASS) 4x $120
OS Drive (SSD) OCZ RevoDrive X2 240GB PCI-E 4x SSD $680
Memory 2x Patriot 12GB (3x4GB) DDR3 1333 2x $360
Power Supply Antec TPQ-1200 80 Plus Silver $250
Case Lian Li PC-V2120X ATX Full Tower $500
Optical Drive LG 10x Blu-Ray Burner w/Lightscribe $100
Keyboard Das Keyboard Professional Model S Silent $135
Alt Keyboard Logitech G510 Keyboard $100
Mouse Razer Mamba 5600 DPI Wired/Wireless $130
Monitor Dell U3011 30" 2560x1600 IPS $1350
Sound Card Creative 7.1 24-bit PCI-E X-Fi Titanium $75
Total System Price $8610

When I heard that the whole AnandTech staff was going to get to put together a rig of their choice, I instantly gravitated to the super high end. Heck, there's no reason you can't at least ask for the absolute best, even if you know it's out of your price range. For others, maybe you really do want to go sky high and push the limits of what's possible with desktop parts without getting too exotic. Either way, this dream machine build isn't for the faint of heart.

I've configured and built a number of dual processor Xeon 56xx series workstations in the past, yet each time destined for a fairly mundane existence doing computational modeling or some other serious business. Each time I'm finished, there's a brief but overwhelming temptation to install Crysis, Metro 2033—heck, something!—with all the eye candy on max with a 2560x1600 display. Each time, I shake that thought away right after finishing burn-in testing as I pop in the latest version of whatever *nix flavor is appropriate. I kid myself that maybe eventually I'll be able to build something like this without having to justify every bit of it as being vitally critical for modeling complicated scientific something or other. Anyway, if you've got nearly limitless piles of sweet cash lying around, this is the rig for you.

Starting out is really the motherboard. Initially, I wanted to go with a server-class motherboard, the SupermicroMBD-X8DTi, having worked with it and similar workstation boards in the past. If you want a dual CPU motherboard, the options basically dictate either a similar class of "server" motherboard like theMBD-X8DTi from Supermicro, something comparable from Tyan, or the only choice in the more conventional desktop class of products, the EVGA Classified SR-2. TheMBD-X8DTi and SR-2 are actually quite similar; both are built around the Intel 5520 and ICH10R chipsets, both are happy with an unreasonable number of triple channel ECC or non-ECC DDR3-1333 memory, and both actually present similar PCI-E lane configurations. The Supermicro comes with onboard graphics, but we'd obviously recommend disabling that in the BIOS and forgetting about it. The Supermicro board costs $430, whereas the Classified SR-2 costs a slightly mind-bending $590. The difference between the two is ultimately whether you want SLI licensing so you can stick in some some multi-GPU goodness from NVIDIA. Remember that NVIDIA still requires either a BIOS key or NVIDIA bridge chip for SLI to work, both of which the cheaper Supermicro board lacks. AMD CrossFire remains feasible on both, but that difference, along with the more enthusiast-oriented features like overclocking support, ultimately led me to settle on the SR-2, despite its nose-bleed-inducing price tag.

Of course, now that we've incurred such a large price premium to get a two-socket motherboard, we should stick in at least a couple hex-core CPUs, right? Two 6-core CPUs with Hyper-Threading gives a whopping 24 threads of power. For that, there's Intel Westmere—the SR-2 andMBX-X8DTi both support Xeon 5500 and 5600 series. At the most extreme, there's the 3.33GHz Xeon 5680, which runs $1725, but anyone can sort by price and see what's the most expensive, and we're still at least somewhat interested in performance per buck (or are we?) The Xeon 5680 can Turbo from 3.33GHz to 3.6GHz. Subjectively, the Xeon X5660 seems to be a better tradeoff between price and stock clock speed at 2.8GHz, plus you get a larger turbo boost up to 3.2GHz. Either way, the two CPUs will set you back a big chunk of change. As one reader pointed out, you also need a heatsink for Xeon, as it doesn't ship with one, so we grabbed a couple of Xigmatek Dark-Knight coolers.

In the traditional workstation configuration, I usually opt for a Cooler Master Cosmos or Cosmos S, and when I think about what's really ultimate in the case market these days, my mind immediately settles on either the iconic Thermaltake Level 10 or the ABS Canyon 695. TheMBD-X8DTi and other workstation boards are E-ATX, which would fit in all the aforementioned cases but the Level 10. Unfortunately, the SR-2 is enormous and necessitated EVGA to define their own motherboard form factor entirely—HPTX—which is a mind-numbing 13.6" x 15". The result is that our case recommendation is limited unless you're willing to go custom or break out the Dremel. Luckily, there's a line of HPTX cases by Lian Li that are attractive and fit the SR-2 just fine. If you're opposed to finding a motherboard tray properly machined for HPTX or loath to do modifications yourself, the Lian Li PC-V2120X is what you should go for.

Moving along we come to the GPUs; I talked with Ryan on this to get his input, and ultimately we both agreed on 2xSLI GTX 580s. EVGA is (at time of this writing) offering the Superclocked version at 797MHz core/1594MHz shader clocks for prices on par with the competition's regularly clocked GTX 580s. The choice is simple at that point: go for the factory overclocked EVGA while it's still feasible.

Storage on a dream build would be incomplete without an SSD for the OS. Thankfully, the RevoDrive X2 is indeed bootable and thus makes an ideal drive for the OS and critical system apps. On every system I've built in recent memory, I've gone with an SSD + RAID array of slow but capacious storage; I think the same is best here. Get four or five 1.5TB or higher HDDs of whatever brand makes you feel warmest inside, toss them in a RAID5 set, and enjoy a crap-ton of storage that's fully redundant. I suppose if you're really feeling ultimate, you could get a RAID card instead of using the ICH10R's software fakeRAID, but it probably isn't critical unless you want to eek out everything you can from those mechanical drives.

My dream PC would be incomplete without at least 12GB of RAM—it's just that simple. I think it's safe to say that 6GB is pretty standard for midrange X58 gaming builds, with 8GB and 12GB starting to become the norm at the fringes. To stay safely ahead, you've got to move to 24GB, which is actually surprisingly common for workstations processing huge datasets that need to exist entirely in RAM. Of course, it's more than likely that no game will ever make use of the 24GB, but we're building the ultimate system here, right? The objective is to play Crysis within Crysis if we could. I settled on two sets of matched Patriot 12GB (3x4GB) kits, as all the 24GB (3x8GB) kits I could find were either sold out or lacked heat spreaders. You should still get triple-channel performance on either the SupermicroMBD-X8DTi or EVGA SR-2 with six populated memory slots, but it definitely makes me a little uneasy populating so many if you don't have lots of airflow.

For the power supply, we're big fans of the Antec TPQ-1200 Silver, which packs a half and half modular/fixed set of cables. It's a combination that provides the best of both worlds for not blocking airflow with unused power cables, and fixed cables for being absolutely certain connectors aren't a concern. The TPQ-1200 is (as the name implies) 1200W, which should be adequate for the SR-2, two Xeons, and two GTX 580s, plus all those mechanical drives.

I'm a fan of LG's 10x Blu-ray burner with LightScribe support, purely because it's SATA, well received, and I've built a number of systems with it in the past. You get DVD+/-R support at 16x, and CDR support at 48x, which is pretty standard. I'm a sucker for LightScribe support just because I always convince myself that the next batch of writeable disks I buy will also be LightScribe; sadly, I've somehow avoided ever doing it. Regardless, the optical drive is quickly becoming marginalized, but for your ultimate build, why not include one? Same thing with the sound card—you don't really need one anymore if onboard audio suffices, but if we're going for the ultimate, you might as well consider it.

Since we're going all out, we'd be remiss if we didn't include suggestions for the peripherals as well. When I think of the ultimate keyboard, I immediately think of one keyboard—the Das Keyboard. If you haven't heard of it, chances are you've been living under a rock, or been blind sighted by all the flashy gaming-focused keyboards with copious amounts of LED lights but little attention to the mechanics of keydomes. If you want a gaming keyboard, get the Logitech G510—it's awesome and I have one—but if you're serious about typing, consider the Das Keyboard. Das Keyboard is essentially the modern IBM model M equivalent, and is a joy to type on purely because of the serious mechanical and aural feedback. For the mouse, I'm a huge fan of Razer. I worked my way from the Logitech MX1000 (the first laser mouse) through a number of Logitech and Razer mice alike, but keep settling back down on Razer. It's ultimately a matter of personal taste.

Last but certainly not least is the monitor. The choices here are quite obvious: either buy a 30" Dell U3011 or its archrival, the HP ZR30w. Both are IPS, both look superb, and both round out the dream configuration. Or maybe you need two 30-inchers? I've left out a fan recommendation since the stock fans for these Xeons have (thus far) seemed sufficient, but the usual Zalman 120mm or similar are always an option I'd encourage.

This configuration is again insane, but at the end of it all, I still find myself thoroughly convinced that if I had infinite monies, I'd put it together in a heartbeat—and maybe even splurge for that 3.33GHz Xeon 5680, regardless of the fact that it's overkill even for Crysis. If you had infinite cash or an appetite for the drooling-on-the-carpet insane—and need it right stinkin' now—this is the system I'd recommend, right after I note that Sandy Bridge is right around the corner. If this configuration is financially justifiable to you, by all means, do it! (And send us some benchmarks and pictures!) Alas, for me, it's still little more than a holiday dream.

Ryan's High-End Gaming System Ganesh's Midrange HTPC
Comments Locked

112 Comments

View All Comments

  • prdola0 - Friday, November 19, 2010 - link

    In some of the systems, I would buy a GTX460 1GB instead of the HD6850 simply because most people play in 1920x1200 and lower (I would say 1680x1050 as the most common) and in those resolutions the GTX460 is better than the HD6850. It would be also a choice for the next generation of games, if the consoles ever let it come. Otherwise very nice systems.

    One question though, are all those memories you guys used from QVLs of the motherboards or do you just trust them?

    Thanks a lot,
    Prdola
  • ganeshts - Friday, November 19, 2010 - link

    The components suggested in my mid-range HTPC build are all tried and tested together :)
  • therealnickdanger - Friday, November 19, 2010 - link

    It would be cool if each of these builds was benched and the results were shown... :) I know that's asking a lot, but like Brian said:

    "Heck, there's no reason you can't at least ask for the absolute best..."
  • AnnihilatorX - Saturday, November 20, 2010 - link

    I'd personally go for HD6850. It runs cooler, uses less power, can double up as high quality sound card (if you have a AV receiver with HDMI, Radeon HD68xx support DTS Master HD, etc).
  • prdola0 - Monday, November 22, 2010 - link

    The GTX460 can of course also double up as a high quality soind card. Why wouldn't it?
  • blotto5 - Saturday, November 20, 2010 - link

    for 1680x1050 it does perform better, but not by much. for 1920x1200 there is almost no difference, and for any resolution higher than that the 6850 blows it out of the water. when your have an amd processor and an amd chipset it would make sense to stay on the same platform and get an amd video card, everything plays nice together that way.
  • prdola0 - Monday, November 22, 2010 - link

    Any nVidia graphics card will work just as good on an AMD system as on an Intel system. How did you find that it wouldn't? That's totally false.

    And your statement about no difference in 1920x1200 is only valid for the GTX460 768MB. The 1GB version is actually still better at 1920x1200. According to Steam Survey, 74.2% of players play at 1680x1050 or lower resolution and only 4.19% play at higher resolutions than 1920x1200. I still don't understand why all the reviews focus so much on the 2560x1600 resolution. I wish Ryan didn't ignore that fact in his Final Words. But world isn't perfect :)
  • Quizzical - Friday, November 19, 2010 - link

    If Zambezi isn't going to fit Socket AM3, then someone ought to tell AMD.

    End of page 5 of the AMD codename decoder that they released on financial analyst day:

    “Zambezi”
    Market: Desktop
    What is it? four-, six-, or eight-core 32-nm AM3 socket desktop processor based on
    the “Bulldozer” processor architecture for the enthusiast market.
    Planned for introduction: 1H 2011

    If I give a link, this site apparently flags the comment as spam and disallows it. But you can find it yourself as follows. Do a Google search for "AMD 2010 Financial Analyst Day". Click the (currently) top search result, to a page on AMD's site with that headline. Click the "AMD Codename Decoder" link from that page. The above is a copy and paste from the end of the document.
  • Dustin Sklavos - Friday, November 19, 2010 - link

    Later on in the year they did say they tried to make Bulldozer compatible with the existing AM3 socket but couldn't do it, as a result you get AM3r2, where the motherboards will be backwards compatible with old AM3 chips, but the Bulldozer chips aren't going to be compatible with old AM3 boards.
  • Quizzical - Friday, November 19, 2010 - link

    The information I quoted was released by AMD last week. "Later on in the year" than that would have to be very, very recent. As I said, if the information that AMD just released is wrong, someone should tell them to fix it.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now