GPU Performance

As previously discussed, on the GPU Samsung has added two additional shader cores to the Mali T760 for additional performance in addition to a clock speed bump from 700 to 772 MHz maximum. To evaluate the effects of this we look at GFXBench which is generally accepted as a pure GPU benchmark.

GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan (Onscreen)

GFXBench 3.0 Manhattan (Offscreen)

GFXBench 3.0 T-Rex HD (Onscreen)

GFXBench 3.0 T-Rex HD (Offscreen)

From the results the Mali T760MP8 GPU of the Exynos 7420 performs admirably in comparison to the Adreno 430 of the Snapdragon 810. We see a 10% lead over the Adreno 430 in Manhattan, growing to 20% in T-Rex. Qualcomm hinted that the Adreno 430 is more strongly improved in ALU performance over the Adreno 420, which would explain why the gap isn't as significant this generation. A 700 MHz clock on the Adreno 430 would likely equal to T760 in this case, but I suspect the power consumption of such a clock would be untenable. The Galaxy S6 does fall behind on the on-screen benchmarks due to the 1440p display compared to the 1080p display of the One M9, but rendering at a lower resolution would avoid most of these problems in real games.

Display

As previously discussed, the Galaxy S6 line introduces a newer generation of AMOLED displays, which is said to increase maximum luminance to 600 nits. Samsung claims that this was achieved with the use of new materials, which is likely necessary in order to sustain power efficiency improvements. It doesn't seem that AMOLED is uniquely suited to high resolution, but rather that Samsung Display Corp. is managing to dramatically improve how they make AMOLED displays with every year that offset power consumption increases from higher resolution displays. To find out how Samsung did, we use SpectraCal's CalMAN 5 Ultimate, in addition to X-Rite's i1Pro2 Basic to characterize displays as accurately as possible.

Display - Max Brightness

From the results Samsung's claims of a 600 nit display are valid in this case, which is a 100% APL white display. It's important to note that achieving this requires the use of auto-brightness, and that manual brightness is limited to a much lower brightness to reduce power usage, here the S6 sees similar maximum brightness as the S5. The S6 edge disappointingly only achieves 272 nits in this mode, a rather low value. I saw color balance shift dramatically in auto-boost mode, which suggests that this operating mode is likely less efficient than manual brightness. As an explanation, we've seen that colors are controlled in AMOLED by voltage while brightness is controlled by PWM (pulse width modulation). As with most recent AMOLED displays, there's no DC bias to the pixels so the contrast really is infinite instead of just a very large number when displaying black.

Galaxy S6

Galaxy S6 edge

Display - White Point

Display - Grayscale Accuracy

Moving on to grayscale, we can see that Samsung has done a pretty good job of controlling the white point and gamma across the saturation sweep, even if green is slightly dominant in both displays. We can also see that there is variation across displays as the S6 edge is closer to neutral while the S6 sample tends a bit warmer.

Galaxy S6

Galaxy S6 Edge

Display - Saturation Accuracy

In the saturation sweep, both displays do an incredible job. I really don't have anything else to say here, because there's really no way to improve on the level of calibration Samsung has done on this display. Unless Samsung calibrates every single display in production, which is wildly impractical and effectively impossible to do, this is as good as it gets for a mass-produced device. Improving past this point will also be incredibly difficult to perceive, which means there's no real reason to go any further.

Galaxy S6

Galaxy S6 edge

Display - GMB Accuracy

In the Gretag MacBeth ColorChecker, we can get an idea for overall color accuracy, which paints a picture similar to the saturation test. The only real problem I've noticed with these displays are the viewing angles, which can produce color shifting when the display is tilted. This is a bit of an issue on the edge variant as I can see that the edges of the display appear somewhat green when viewed head on, but otherwise there are no real issues to be seen here. Overall, this is probably the best display anyone will be able to get in a smartphone right now. This level of progress is amazing from Samsung, given just how bad things were with the Galaxy S' AMOLED display, even as recent as the display of the Galaxy S4. With the Galaxy S5 review, I said that I wouldn't be surprised to see AMOLED equal, if not exceed LCD within a year or two, and Samsung has managed to finally hit that mark.

Introduction and System Performance Initial Thoughts
Comments Locked

200 Comments

View All Comments

  • SoC-IT2ME - Thursday, March 26, 2015 - link

    Use an app called LUX DASH, goes below 0% brightness for any device. Use it on my S3.

    Though from what I've seen, the S6 goes very dim as standard.
  • MercuryHero - Tuesday, April 14, 2015 - link

    I've looked at the S6 in a store and at minimum brightness the screen is too dark to see, it just looks black making it hard to find the brightness controls again to turn it back up.

    That said, it was a brightly lit store in daytime, as all phone stores are.
  • JoshHo - Thursday, March 26, 2015 - link

    The minimum brightness is around 2 nits.
  • robertkoa - Thursday, March 26, 2015 - link

    On my Alpha there's an Auto mode so with dim light the settings get very low and in Sun they get very bright...so browsing in the Dark is very nice...screen can be very dim I assume they have this on S6 ...
  • DigitalFreak - Thursday, March 26, 2015 - link

    Will an unlocked S6 work on all carriers, like the Nexus 6 and iPhone 6? From a technology standpoint, all "premium" phones should be able to do this now.
  • robertkoa - Thursday, March 26, 2015 - link

    Will work if you have the Frequency Bands BUT you lose features like VoLTE on a factory unlocked phone ...which are still Carrier Specific Software...
  • MercuryHero - Tuesday, April 14, 2015 - link

    Confirm frequency bands at http://www.gsmarena.com/samsung_galaxy_s6-6849.php - there are 3 different variants supporting different frequency bands (press Expand to see them).

    But all of them will work with most networks world-wide because all of them support a huge range of bands. The G920A (AT&T) and G920T (T-mobile) appear support the widest range of frequency bands and only differ from each other in a couple of rare LTE bands.
  • TrojMacReady - Thursday, March 26, 2015 - link

    Hmm, stock browser gives a low 4300's score in Kraken. Not sure how representative these tests are when Samsung is known not to pay more attention to its stock browser optimizations than Chrome and others.
  • shadarlo - Friday, March 27, 2015 - link

    REALLY sick of these ultra high resolution displays that add no benefits but destroy battery life.

    1920x1080p is the max I want on a phone... but I don't want to back-track to a lower processor to get it. Why won't a company realize that consumers will love 2 days battery life more than they love a resolution bump they won't even be able to notice?
  • AnnonymousCoward - Friday, March 27, 2015 - link

    Seriously. Marketing people are probably driving the specs. I'd rather have 4.7", 1080p max, and a thicker dimension with a bigger battery.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now