3D Movement Algorithm Test

The algorithms in 3DPM employ both uniform random number generation or normal distribution random number generation, and vary in various amounts of trigonometric operations, conditional statements, generation and rejection, fused operations, etc.  The benchmark runs through six algorithms for a specified number of particles and steps, and calculates the speed of each algorithm, then sums them all for a final score.  This is an example of a real world situation that a computational scientist may find themselves in, rather than a pure synthetic benchmark.  The benchmark is also parallel between particles simulated, and we test the single thread performance as well as the multi-threaded performance.

3D Particle Movement - Single Threaded

3D Particle Movement - MultiThreaded

Due to the default overclock enabled option of ASUS and Gigabyte boards, the ASRock unfortunately lags behind noticeably in multithreaded testing.  The ASRock should have average single thread performance in comparison, but in our 3DPM test, the Professional comes in with the lowest score.

WinRAR x64 3.93 - link

With 64-bit WinRAR, we compress the set of files used in the USB speed tests. WinRAR x64 3.93 attempts to use multithreading when possible.

WinRAR x64 3.93

As a test that utilizes multithreading where possible, WinRAR exposes how the motherboards react to changes in load and application of turbo modes.  The ASRock Fatal1ty Z77 Professional does well here, edging out the ASUS Pro and coming streaks ahead of the Extreme4.

FastStone Image Viewer 4.2 - link

FastStone Image Viewer is a free piece of software I have been using for quite a few years now.  It allows quick viewing of flat images, as well as resizing, changing color depth, adding simple text or simple filters.  It also has a bulk image conversion tool, which we use here.  The software currently operates only in single-thread mode, which should change in later versions of the software.  For this test, we convert a series of 170 files, of various resolutions, dimensions and types (of a total size of 163MB), all to the .gif format of 640x480 dimensions.

FastStone Image Viewer 4.2

Focusing purely on single threaded performance, the Fatal1ty does not perform too well.  With the ASUS Deluxe somehow blitzing the field, nothing is coming close.

Xilisoft Video Converter

With XVC, users can convert any type of normal video to any compatible format for smartphones, tablets and other devices.  By default, it uses all available threads on the system, and in the presence of appropriate graphics cards, can utilize CUDA for NVIDIA GPUs as well as AMD APP for AMD GPUs.  For this test, we use a set of 32 HD videos, each lasting 30 seconds, and convert them from 1080p to an iPod H.264 video format using just the CPU.  The time taken to convert these videos gives us our result.

Xilisoft Video Converter

As Xilisoft stresses all cores all of the time, the ASUS and Gigabyte boards have the advantage with that default overclock in multithreaded load.  As a result, the Professional lags behind a touch.

x264 HD Benchmark

The x264 HD Benchmark uses a common HD encoding tool to process an HD MPEG2 source at 1280x720 at 3963 Kbps.  This test represents a standardized result which can be compared across other reviews, and is dependant on both CPU power and memory speed.  The benchmark performs a 2-pass encode, and the results shown are the average of each pass performed four times.

x264 Pass 1

x264 Pass 2

In yet another multithreaded test, the Professional does not break into the top half of the motherboard testing due to that speed deficit.

System Benchmarks Gaming Benchmarks
Comments Locked

57 Comments

View All Comments

  • kevith - Monday, May 21, 2012 - link

    Yeah, that struck me as well.
  • scaramoosh - Sunday, May 20, 2012 - link

    I wont buy anything branded by that loser who hasn't really competed since 2005.
  • Iketh - Sunday, May 20, 2012 - link

    someone sounds bitter lol

    haters gonna hate!
  • Friendly0Fire - Monday, May 21, 2012 - link

    I wouldn't call him a loser, but I too would rather like the Fatal1ty crap toned down a bit. I've never seen him play, I actually don't give a damn about him, so his likeness appearing on products that I otherwise could want to buy feels more like excessive branding than anything else.

    I can see why he's on them, of course: he did a lot of firsts and his nickname is marketable (it's got a bit of a "leetspeak" feel, which apparently appeals to a certain audience, it's "edgy" but still family-friendly, etc.). As much as I respect Starcraft players, I don't think NesTea or Stephano-branded hardware would sound good.
  • Reikon - Sunday, May 20, 2012 - link

    I've always wondered if Fatal1ty branding actually convinced anyone to buy something. It usually just drives me away since it seems more like a branding gimmick for something that can't stand on its own.
  • Camikazi - Monday, May 21, 2012 - link

    That is like asking if Michael Jordan branded shoes, or Tony Hawk branded skateboard ever prompted someone to buy them. The answer is easy, OF COURSE IT DOES, there are always people who don't know enough about things that go for celeb branded items because the celebs endorsed it. They don't know or care enough to find out that there are cheaper parts that are as good or better out there they just want the name.
  • Matt355 - Monday, May 21, 2012 - link

    Thought I was the only one that felt that way.
  • FozzyofAus - Sunday, May 20, 2012 - link

    I also don't see the point of an IDE or Floppy port.

    How about a review of the uATX version of the board? I'm not convinced that many people really need a full ATX board anymore.
  • iamkyle - Sunday, May 20, 2012 - link

    Seriously Jon? You "consultations" with manufacturers lead you to add long gone legacy floppy and IDE?

    Somebody PLEASE make me an enthusiast board with barebones I/O - USB only. Let me choose my NIC & my sound MYSELF. As a TRUE enthusiast would.
  • jabber - Monday, May 21, 2012 - link

    Exactly a real hardcore gamers board would be stripped of everything not required to just get the PC up and running.

    Then you would have a board with the minimum of traces and junk on it for the best performance. No fat at all. Then add just the hardware you need and nothing else.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now