NVIDIA Updates GeForce 600 OEM Desktop Lineup, Adds GT 645, GT 640, GT 630by Ryan Smith on April 25, 2012 4:30 AM EST
While NVIDIA doesn’t publically announce most of their OEM desktop graphics cards, they do update their website with the specifications of these cards, which is how we usually find out about them. Today has been no exception, and after NVIDIA's latest site update a bit of digging has unearthed the fact that NVIDIA has released their first Kepler cards for the desktop market. There are 5 new OEM desktop cards, composing a mix of both Kepler and Fermi: the GT 645, the GT 640, and the GT 630.
|GT 645||GT 640||GT 640||GT 640||GT 630|
|Memory Clock||3.828GHz GDDR5||5GHz GDDR5||1.782GHz DDR3||1.782GHz DDR3||1.782GHz DDR3|
|Memory Bus Width||192-bit*||128-bit||192-bit||128-bit||128-bit|
|Manufacturing Process||TSMC 40nm||TSMC 28nm||TSMC 40nm||TSMC 28nm||TSMC 28nm|
If this product stack looks familiar, it should. It’s generally the same product stack as the GeForce 600 series Mobile lineup, except with higher clockspeeds. As with their mobile parts, NVIDIA is going to be mixing 40nm Fermi parts and 28nm Kepler parts into their desktop product stack, leading to a hilariously frustrating selection of video cards.
At the top of the new product stack we have the GT 645, which is a GF114 Fermi rehash. GT 645 has 288 CUDA cores enabled and paired with what’s listed as a very crippled 128bit memory bus. However considering the memory bandwidth NVIDIA lists for the card (91.9GB/sec) and the fact that they already have a very similar card in the GTX 560 SE, we’re confident that the 128bit bus in NVIDIA’s specs is a typo and that it’s actually a 192bit bus, and we are listing it in our charts accordingly. In any case you’re still looking at significantly less memory bandwidth the GTX 560 is typically paired with.
The next card is the GT 640, the GT 640, and the GT 640. Just like the GT 640M LE, NVIDIA is mixing Fermi and Kepler here in a very odd manner. We have a GT 640 that’s a full GK107 (384 cores) with GDDR5 memory and a fairly high clockspeed, a GT 640 that’s a binned GF116 (144 cores) with DDR3 memory, and a GT 640 that’s a full GK107 (384 cores) with DDR3 memory and lower clockspeeds. Not even the TDP or form factor is consistent among these cards; the GK107 DDR3 card is a low-profile 50W card, while the other two are full-profile 75W cards.
Update: 5/19 The final card is the GT 630, which is another GK107 part. This is a harvested one with 1 of 2 SMXes disabled, leaving 192 CUDA cores active. It's paired with DDR3 memory and a mid-range clockspeed, giving it a TDP of 50W. The most interesting part? It’s clocked higher than the equivalent GT 640 though the disabled SMX will do plenty to keep the GT 630 behind the Kepler GT 640.
It’s safe to say that at this point the OEM desktop video card market has turned into a similar mess as the OEM laptop market, and this latest round of video cards serves to cement that fact. As with the laptop market we’ve reached a point where it’s nearly impossible to tell which video card a product actually uses based on computer specs alone, and that’s worrisome. Accordingly, our best advice for buying an OEM desktop is the same as buying an OEM laptop: make sure you research what you're getting if you want faster GPU performance. It may not be possible to tell what video card is in use until a product has been reviewed.
Oh a final note, it’s interesting though not surprising that NVIDIA is releasing desktop GK107 cards to OEMs first. They did the same thing with the GT 200 series, which were NVIDIA’s first 40nm cards, and while these GT 600 cards don’t have the same distinction, the root cause – a lack of sufficient GPU supply – is the same. On a positive note however, this launch means that retail GK107 desktop cards – particularly a retail version of the GDDR5 + GK107 based GT 640 – can’t be too far away; we’d speculate a few months at the most. So budget desktop users shouldn’t be waiting too much longer for the 28nm generation to hit their market segment.
Source: SH SOTN, NVIDIA
Post Your CommentPlease log in or sign up to comment.
View All Comments
Sabresiberian - Wednesday, April 25, 2012 - linkI would say people like you who live in some kind of woo-woo land where you make up your own "facts" to support your beliefs are part of the problem, not the solution.
piroroadkill - Thursday, April 26, 2012 - linkThat's true. Tricks do dominate, but they're not really on.
zcat - Wednesday, April 25, 2012 - linkReally looking forward to seeing these new mid/high-end kepler cards reviewed, specifically in terms of idle TDP vs max performance. If the idle is under ~10W, AND performance at least matches AMDs 7700-series, then NVidia will be going in my next mini-ITX linux build.
overseer - Wednesday, April 25, 2012 - linkInstead of spitting vulgar words to the card namings, I choose to LMAO.
fic2 - Wednesday, April 25, 2012 - link"Accordingly, our best advice for buying an OEM desktop is the same as buying an OEM laptop: make sure you research what you're getting if you want faster GPU performance. It may not be possible to tell what video card is in use until a product has been reviewed."
Seems like the best advice for someone buying an OEM desktop is just buy a separate video card since you can't tell what you are getting with Nvidia's naming scheme.
Einy0 - Wednesday, April 25, 2012 - linkGT640, GT640 and GT640 isn't it a little late for an April Fools Joke???
These video cards are getting harder to sort out every year. I was thinking about getting a GT 570 but wanted to wait and see if there would be a 670 or a rockin' 660 /650 series that was close to GT 570. Now I have my doubts, maybe I will buy an AMD card instead...
Sabresiberian - Wednesday, April 25, 2012 - linkYou mean GTX 570? There is no "GT" 570. This is part of the problem, of course, though it''s a bit clearer that the GT series is much lower powered than the GTX series.
Before you buy a new video card, be sure to consider the amount of memory for your purpose. The standard 1280 MB on a GTX 570 isn't all that much these days.. That's a big reason Nvidia developed FXAA, it's much more memory efficient, which is one reason they went with 2GB of graphics card memory on the GTX 680 instead of the 3GB AMD put on their 7970 - they could afford to keep the cost down using less memory without giving up any performance, comparatively speaking.
edge929 - Thursday, April 26, 2012 - linkAt least the 630 is 28nm only. Eye-balling it for an HTPC.