AMD's 65nm Preview Part 2 - The Plot Thickens (Updated with Information from AMD)
by Anand Lal Shimpi on December 21, 2006 12:12 AM EST- Posted in
- CPUs
The Test
For each benchmark we measured performance as well as average power consumption during the course of the benchmark, finally reporting performance per watt as one divided by the other. Both Cool 'n Quiet and EIST were enabled on all processors.
CPU: | Intel Core 2 Duo E6600 (2.40GHz/4MB) AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ (2.6GHz/512KBx2) AMD Athlon 64 X2 5000+ EE "Brisbane" AMD Athlon 64 X2 4800+ EE "Brisbane" AMD Athlon 64 X2 EE 4600+ (2.4GHz/512KBx2) AMD Athlon 64 X2 EE SFF 3800+ (2.0GHz/512KBx2) |
Motherboard: | eVGA NVIDIA nForce 680i ASUS M2N32-SLI Deluxe |
Chipset: | nForce 680i nForce 590 SLI |
Chipset Drivers: | NVIDIA 9.53 NVIDIA 9.35 |
Hard Disk: | Seagate 7200.9 300GB SATA |
Memory: | Corsair XMS2 DDR2-800 4-4-4-12 (1GB x 2) |
Video Card: | NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTX |
Video Drivers: | NVIDIA ForceWare 97.44 |
Resolution: | 1600 x 1200 |
OS: | Windows XP Professional SP2 |
Idle Power Consumption
Brisbane Performance Issues Demystified: Higher Latencies to Blame
Media Encoding Performance & Power Consumption
52 Comments
View All Comments
theteamaqua - Thursday, December 21, 2006 - link
man i hope this thing overclocks like conroe.... otherwise no one will get quad fatherbut i already have E6400 @ 3.4GHz ...
might get Q6600 , Q6400 or Yorksfield or Altair ... ill what see what happens
clairvoyant129 - Thursday, December 21, 2006 - link
Right here,http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?...">http://www.anandtech.com/cpuchipsets/showdoc.aspx?...
Nothing special though.
Better to stick with the 90nm X2 then this piece of junk.