Synthetic and Legacy Results (15W)

The realm of synthetic testing is a tricky one, given that there are plenty of benchmarks in the wild that provide a number, but aren’t actually based on real workloads, or are very limited in what they actually test. The issue here is that this software tries to emulate real-world, but it isn’t immersed in the harnesses or matrix of what a user might actually experience. For that reason, we only tend to use these benchmarks based on reader requests.

Legacy benchmarks are included for similar reasons, but can help to get a historical perspective.

GeekBench ST

GeekBench MT

x264 HD 3.0 Pass 1

x264 HD 3.0 Pass 2

System Results (15W) Gaming Results (15W and 25W)
Comments Locked

261 Comments

View All Comments

  • HStewart - Thursday, August 1, 2019 - link

    Keep in mind AMD 7nm die does not mean higher transistors than Intel 10nm Because under different process companies. Lower number does not always mean better
  • zodiacfml - Friday, August 2, 2019 - link

    I'm saying that Intel's die/wafer is probably larger than AMD's 7nm die considering the decent IGP that comes with the Intel chip. I realized my comment is pointless though considering AMD has not released a 7nm APU yet for a proper comparison.
  • Phynaz - Thursday, August 1, 2019 - link

    Yawn, another AMD troll that doesn’t know what a laptop is.
  • Tyler_Durden_83 - Thursday, August 1, 2019 - link

    My God these new ICL parts are, considering the wait, even more yawn than the 2080 super was...
  • shabby - Thursday, August 1, 2019 - link

    I think it would be smart to wait for retail laptops to hit the market before drawing a conclusion on ice lake, who knows what tweaks this ringer laptop from intel has.
  • GreenReaper - Friday, August 2, 2019 - link

    Having the fan running on full all the time is kinda cheating to start with. You wouldn't actually want that as a laptop experience. However, the laptops were actually designed for OS testing (where you typically want to avoid throttling to have clean data) so I can cut them a bit of slack there.
  • masimilianzo - Thursday, August 1, 2019 - link

    I am sorry it was not clear to me if the 3.9GHz turbo frequency was kept for all the duration of the Spec2k6/2k17 benchmark runs.
  • prophet001 - Thursday, August 1, 2019 - link

    Any idea on when desktop SKUs will be coming?
  • Eris_Floralia - Thursday, August 1, 2019 - link

    If you are talking about traditional socketed DT parts, the answer is never.
  • DanNeely - Thursday, August 1, 2019 - link

    There aren't any 10nm desktop parts on leaked roadmaps out to 2021.

    If you trust the leaks from Semi-Accurate there probably never will. Of the 4 planned 10nm fabs one was upgraded to 14nm (from an even older process); one or two others are getting 7nm tooling. That leaves 10nm capacity at 25-50% of originally planned numbers meaning they're never going to make 10nm in high volume which in turn means that large chunks of the market will probably go directly to 7 in a few years after lingering at 14.

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now