When we wrote up our list of 10GBase-T capable consumer motherboards back in July, we noted that out of the two main ways to get 10GBase-T on a motherboard, either by and add-in card or via an integrated controller, only one example of the latter existed on the market. For almost two years, that sole motherboard has been the only integrated solution – since then, ASUS launched the Maximus VIII Assembly which comes with a single port add-in card, and we saw a micro-ATX C236 model with a single port from MSI at Computex. We also listed the X99-E-10G WS from ASUS, a new board set to come to the market and we had an early sample. We’re still testing the board, but ASUS is officially announcing it today.

The X99-E-10G WS is built like a brick outhouse, with the focus on premium workstation parts and the latest set of features ASUS could put together while still under the X99 chipset banner, rather than a Xeon chipset. The board is designed for any Broadwell-E CPU, either consumer i7 or Xeon E5 v4, with extensive heatsink arrangements to carry both the Intel X550-AT2 controller (11W), the chipset, the upgraded power delivery and additional controllers.

The main feature is obviously the 10GBase-T ports, which are RJ45 compatible with most home and SMB networks. The X550-T2 controller is a PCIe 3.0 x4 part, which is an upgrade over the older X540-T2 generation that needed PCIe 2.0 x8 (and even at PCIe 3.0, you still needed 8 lanes due to controller limitations). This controller has a list price on Intel’s ARK of $80 for batches of 1000, however it probably adds nearer $100-$150 to the motherboard cost paid for by the end user. Alongside the Ethernet ports are a pair of 10 Gbps USB 3.1 ports (one Type-C), four USB 3.0 ports and the audio.

The board has full support for PCIe graphics, using dual PLX8747s as high-end PCIe switches. This allows support of x16/x16/x16/x16 slots (or x16/x8/x8/x8/x8/x8/x8) while also having enough bandwidth for the X550-T2 controller, a U.2 connector running at PCIe 3.0 x4 as well as an M.2 slot also at PCIe 3.0 x4. The PCIe slots have two additional features, with integrated guard rails in each of the slots to increase rigidity and reduce RMAs, but also the PCIe latches are translucent. When the system is turned on, the main PCIe slot connectors have a LED light that implements a slow breathing effect. Speaking with the motherboard product managers, it turns out that users do not often know which PCIe slots are suitable for maximum bandwidth, and this is designed to help.

The ASUS X99-E-10G WS also comes with 10 SATA 6 Gbps ports, dual USB 3.0 onboard headers, Dr. Power, BIOS Flashback, EZ XMP and an upgraded audio solution. ASUS expects the board to land with an MSRP of $650 with select authorized resellers and distributors soon.

Source: ASUS Edge Up

Comments Locked


View All Comments

  • RaistlinZ - Monday, August 29, 2016 - link

    Do want. Can't afford.
  • ltcommanderdata - Monday, August 29, 2016 - link

    "The board has full support for PCIe graphics, using a PLX8780 high-end PCIe switch."

    Are you sure it uses a PLX8780? The manual below shows 2 PLX8747 switches instead in the Appendix A-1 block diagram.

  • Ian Cutress - Monday, August 29, 2016 - link

    You're right. For whatever reason the manual wasn't available when I checked just now - it could be that I'm directed to the UK page and something isn't synchronizing right? I've updated the text and will upload the chipset diagram when I get to a PC.
  • RaichuPls - Wednesday, August 31, 2016 - link

    What's the difference between the PLX chips?
  • zepi - Monday, August 29, 2016 - link

    I have one question in mind:

    How is that we've had 10Gbps Thunderbolt ports and 5Gbps USB3.0 ports using copper wiring for aoens in our cheap consumer grade battery powered tiny little Chinese built devices, but we don't get 10GbE ports even in relatively expensive mid-range motherboards?

    Is it really just the difficulty of driving the electric load (impedances / inducatances) of 100M cable at needed frequencies (250 / 500MHz frequencies) instead of 1-5meters that is reasonable spec for Thunderbolt 2.0 / USB3 cables?

    Because otherwise I don't really understand what is the problem in modulating voltage to 2-4 pins of RJ45 connector?
  • Gigaplex - Monday, August 29, 2016 - link

    "Is it really just the difficulty of driving the electric load (impedances / inducatances) of 100M cable at needed frequencies (250 / 500MHz frequencies) instead of 1-5meters that is reasonable spec for Thunderbolt 2.0 / USB3 cables?"

    Essentially, yes.
  • ddriver - Monday, August 29, 2016 - link

    What merits 10 gbit network in consumer products?
  • Capissen38 - Monday, August 29, 2016 - link

    Parts of south Minneapolis have 10 Gbps residential FTTH: http://fiber.usinternet.com/
  • peterfares - Monday, August 29, 2016 - link

    If you're trying to copy a file between two computers with SSDs the 1Gbps Ethernet link is easily the bottleneck.
  • ddriver - Monday, August 29, 2016 - link

    That's hardly a merit. If it was, then everyone outta have a sports car, or better off - a helicopter, because when you are in a hurry, a regular car is easily the bottleneck.

    10 gibt network - that's already too slow, on the odd chances you copy "a file" (let's say data) from one pci-e ssd to another pci-e ssd. Or what if you wanted to copy data from ram to another system's ram?

    Big data transfers are a rarity in consumer usage, but are common in enterprise, which is the market which merits 10gbit and more. For 99.9% of what consumers do 99.9% of the time, 1gbit suffices.

    10gbit internet? That activates my hilarity unit :D

Log in

Don't have an account? Sign up now